Newsletter

Join Us

How many houses does John McCain own?

Blog

The Reviews Are In ...

Check out what the pundits had to say about McCain’s convention speech:

MSNBC Former Republican Speechwriter for President Bush Michael Gerson – “The policy was the problem, the policy in the speech was rather typical for a Republican, pretty disappointing. It didn’t do a lot of outreach to moderates and independents on the issues that they care about. It talked about issues like drilling and school choice, which was really speaking to the converted. I think that was a missed opportunity. Many Americans needed to hear from this speech something they’ve never heard from Republicans before and in reality a lot of the policy they’ve heard from Republicans before.”



CNN David Gergen – “I did not think that the substantive part of the speech worked very well. It was mostly a rerun, retread of a lot of old Republican ideas that have brought us to where we are now. I think the country is looking for fresh answers. It’s hard to separate yourself out from President Bush when you essentially have the same economic policies as President Bush. I thought that the policy presentation was a little thin.”



MSNBC Rachel Maddow – “Honestly it was sort of like a long term paper about Bush Republican economics…But people aren’t mad at Barack Obama about the economy people are mad at George Bush about the economy and he just proposed a lot of Bush’s economic ideas. I think he really missed that.”



MSNBC Howard Fineman – “Sarah Palin is the ideological heir – heiress of George W. Bush”



MSNBC David Gregory – “I am however surprised and this goes to the Mike Gerson point, that there is not more of a blueprint of an appeal to independent and swing voters on policy issues that they will work off of…When he talks about education he talks about it being a civil right for the new century that is a George W. Bush line from the year 2000 when he called education the new civil right. It’s a carbon copy.”



MSNBC Tom Ridge – “Because John Bush – because John McCain is very much his own man”



FOX Chris Wallace – “It was a green backdrop behind him, it was a big lawn in front of a big house. You thought what the heck was that? It looked like it could have been one of the McCain mansions”



FOX Juan Williams – “Juan Williams: But when he tried to draw a contrast with President Bush, which is absolutely essential in order for him to win this election, he just mentioned President Bush once and then I think went on. And by saying I’ll work for you I’m not going to work for party again trying to draw himself apart from the GOP and the Bush brand.

Brit Hume: How well do you think that worked by the way?

Juan Williams: I don’t it worked very well at all.”



CNN Carl Bernstein – “Tonight was very gauzy and unspecific”



CNN Jeffrey Toobin – “I thought it was the worst speech by a nominee that I’ve heard since Jimmy Carter in 1980. I thought it was disorganized, I thought it was it was theme-less, I thought it was very, very boring…I personally cannot remember a single policy proposal that he made because they had nothing connecting them. I found it shockingly bad.”

More Of The Same On The Economy

The Democratic party’s newest ad. Running in Michigan.

Words You're Not Likely To Hear Tonight

George W. Bush

Eight long years ago George Bush took office and since has implemented policies that have hurt American workers economically and reduced our stature worldwide.

Outside of President Bush’s prime time speech Tuesday night, the only mention of George Bush came once in a fleeting reference in Mitt Romney’s speech.

John McCain has not only been a staunch supporter of George Bush these past eight years, but he has also voted with him over 90% of the time. McCain’s economic policies are essentially an extension of Bush’s economic policies, and on the transcendent issues he’s sided with President Bush. Why is McCain so afraid to mention his buddy Bush?

Palin Was A Supporter Of The Bridge To Nowhere

You may be shocked that an assertion that’s been fact checked as incorrect everyday for the last week would find itself in Sarah Palin’s speech accepting the Republican nomination for president. But you shouldn’t be surprised. Here’s what Sarah Palin said last night about her role in acquiring more than $300 million dollars for the bridge to nowhere.

“I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere”

Alaska residents in Ketchikan remember that Sarah Palin was actually an advocate of earmarks to build the infamous bridge to nowhere.

In the city Ketchikan, the planned site of the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere,” political leaders of both parties said the claim was false and a betrayal of their community. Palin had supported the bridge and the earmark for it secured by Alaska’s Congressional delegation during her run for governor.

Here’s what the Anchorage Daily News has written about the McCain campaign’s assertion that Palin fought the bridge to nowhere:

But Palin was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.

The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them “nowhere.” They’re still feeling pain today in Ketchikan, over Palin’s subsequent decision to use the bridge funds for other projects — and over the timing of her announcement, which they say came in a pre-dawn press release that seemed aimed at national news deadlines.

And then there’s Sarah Palin sporting a t-shirt meant to mock outrage over the $300 million bridge to nowhere.

Republicans: Palin Pick Is A Gimmick

Video is worth more than a million words.

« Older